|
CorrectCare
LA Confidential
County Jail Solves MRSA Mystery
|
Related Stories |
|
Itsy Bitsy Spider? These bugs are far
smaller, yet they can wreak havoc
Spider bites can be annoying,
even harmful, but the microscopic bacteria known as
Staphylococcus aureus can be far more virulent. With
up to 30% of the population colonized in the nose at any
given time, staph is one of the most common causes of
minor skin infections, says the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention. However, under the right
conditions, staph infections can be very serious. When
those bacteria are resistant to mainstream antibiotics
such as methicillin, and when they infiltrate a
high-risk setting such as a large urban jail, infections
can spread like wildfire.
Read more... |
Recommendations for Battling MRSA
MRSA infections are an emerging problem
in correctional facilities, and while institutional
settings sometimes can benefit from a standard approach,
it’s important to remember that one size may not fit
all. With that caveat, we present the recommendations
developed for the Los Angeles County jails based on our
experiences with MRSA.
Read more... |
By John H. Clark, MD, CCHP-A
If your jail or
prison has had no cases of methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus infection recently, watch out: MRSA is
on its way to your facility. Sometimes defined as multidrug-resistant
Staph aureus, MRSA is on the rise nationwide and is
especially prevalent in the public health laboratories that are
our nation’s prisons and jails.
The Los Angeles
County jail system became well-acquainted with MRSA over the
past two years, and in response has implemented a rigorous set
of protocols for diagnosing, treating and, perhaps most
importantly, preventing MRSA among our inmate population.
First, let’s
look at the chronology of events. In September 2001, we began to
receive occasional complaints by inmates of spider bites at
several of our facilities. Spider bites can be nasty, and while
we did not see any severe infections during this episode, there
were enough reports to cause some concern.
In response, we
developed a physician protocol that involved culturing, starting
patients on antibiotics and doing incision and drainage when
appropriate and feasible. We also developed briefing notes for
the physician staff to facilitate treatment of these patients.
Detective
Work
By December insect bite reports were increasing steadily, so
we determined to discover what was happening. The sheriff’s
department medical staff worked closely with custody staff, as
well as the county public health department, to inspect each
housing area. We found no nests or other evidence that any
insects were reproducing or thriving. Still, just in case we
were missing them, we confirmed that the contractor who handled
our pest control program was using pesticides effective against
insects and spiders, and we fumigated the sites.
Within a month
or two, we began to receive reports of insect bites at
additional jail facilities. We noticed that most of the reported
bites occurred below the waist, so we took a close look at our
laundry facility, a big operation that serves all of the L.A.
County jails. Again, we did a complete inspection and made sure
that procedures were being followed, but no insects or
incriminating evidence was found. Again, we fumigated the site.
In April 2002,
the focus of the reported bites shifted to yet another jail. We
went through the same drill, but this time we captured five
spiders. An entomologist, however, determined that they were
harmless, nonbiting varieties.
Fingering
the Culprit
The real breakthrough came right around the same time.
In-depth epidemiological interviews with inmates revealed some
behaviors of which we had not been aware. For example, inmates
were sharing razors and other instruments, and were doing minor
procedures such as popping boils. Not to point fingers, but we
also learned of instances where inmates did not have adequate
access to showers or personal hygiene items such as effective
soap or toilet paper. These insights were like a lightbulb
turning on because we knew that poor hygiene is an important
factor in the spread of staph infections.
In May and June
we took a hard look at the results of cultures we had taken and
found an alarming number of MRSA infections. These weren’t
apparent earlier because of the way our jail system handles lab
results. The results are entered into the electronic medical
record and, due to the frequent movement of inmates between
facilities, may not be seen by the physician who ordered the
test. To remedy this, all culture results are now reviewed by
the medical services communicable disease unit.
At this point,
we notified all custody staff that we had identified MRSA as the
source of the skin lesions and explained how it was being
spread. We also requested assistance from the Los Angeles County
Department of Health Services.
Besides
cultures, we also reviewed all hospitalizations related to MRSA,
and all inmate deaths in 2001 that were coded as related to
sepsis.
New
Protocols
Working with the health department, we immediately developed
a joint task force to more thoroughly examine all culture
results, analyzing them by facility and other characteristics.
This revealed that for 75% of the people cultured, results were
positive for MRSA. Given that MRSA incubation periods are
between 1 and 10 days, analysis also showed that about 10% of
new admissions were infected when they arrived.
Molecular
fingerprinting of the bacteria revealed that the outbreaks
throughout the jail were of a single clone, which also is
consistent with the type of MRSA seen in recent outbreaks of
skin infections in Los Angeles County and nationwide.
At this point,
in October 2002, we made a clinical decision that, in addition
to seeing the patient, doing the I&D and culture, and waiting
for the results, we would automatically implemented the revised
treatment protocol. This involves an antibiotic regimen using
the following drugs:
·
Bactrium DS (1 tab PO BID x 7 days) or Clindamycin (300 mg PO
QID x 7 days)
if patient is allergic to
Bactrium or other sulfur drugs
·
Rifampin (300 mg PO BID x 7 days)
By the end of
2002, still working with the health department we conducted
another briefing for all medical staff, we briefed all custody
staff on all shifts at all facilities, and we produced an
educational video for custody staff and inmates.
This experience
also led to the formation of a permanent MRSA task force that
meets monthly to review the progress we have made in carrying
out its recommendations (see box above) and reducing infections.
The task force comprises representatives from the sheriff’s
department, both medical and custody staff, the county health
department and its acute communicable disease unit, and the
Centers for Disease Control.
While the
percentage of MRSA-positive cultures has dropped from the 75% we
experienced before we revised the treatment protocol, we seem to
have plateaued at somewhat more than 50%, or about 110 positive
culture per month. This may be attributable to the fact that we
are doing very aggressive culturing. However, until this figure
drop below 50% we will continue to follow the current protocol,
and it’s likely to be quite awhile before the incidence of MRSA
declines significantly.
Valuable
Lessons
An experience like this teaches some valuable lessons. One
thing we learned is that, if you must report problems like this
to some governmental agency, do it sooner rather than later.
Because we thought we were dealing with simple spider bites we
didn’t notify the county Board of Supervisors until February,
and we took some criticism for “misdiagnosing” the situation.
However, had it not been for complaints about bites and our
response to that, we would not have implemented such an
aggressive culturing program, which soon identified the true
problem.
While our
close collaboration with the county health department was
critical in combating this outbreak, the experience suggests
that it would have been helpful if our communicable disease
management program had already had a section addressing unusual
outbreaks such as MRSA.
Finally,
while it remains unclear exactly what works best in such
situations, without question a multifaceted approach can be very
effective.
—
About the author:
John H.
Clark, MD, CCHP-A, is chief medical officer for the County of
Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department. This article is based on his
presentation at the Clinical Updates in Correctional Health Care
conference in Anaheim, CA, in April. Clark wishes to thank two
colleagues whose efforts were invaluable in identifying this
outbreak: Martha Tadesse, public health nurse in the
communicable disease unit of the Medical Services Bureau, and
Elizabeth Bancroft, MD, epidemiologist for the Los Angeles
County Department of Health Services.
[This article first appeared
in the Summer 2003 issue of CorrectCare.]
|